Forecasting economic variables such as GDP, inflation, demand, commodity prices and financial risks, has always been central to policy, planning, and strategy. But in recent years, forecasting software has transformed that field. Automation, access to large and diverse data sources, machine learning and Bayesian methods, model ensembles, and real-time deployment are now common. A structured evaluation process testing models, holding‐out data, comparing forecast performance, and monitoring drift is essential to identify high performers and ensure continuous improvement. Moreover, it’s no longer enough to build one model and deploy; the best teams continuously deploy new forecasting models and methods, adapt to new data, adapt feature/indicator sets, re-select variables, retrain, and integrate feedback.

In that context, here are 8 of the best econometric forecasting tools for data analysts, evaluated in terms of strengths and weaknesses.

1. Indicio

Introduction
Indicio is a modern automated forecasting platform aimed at bridging advanced econometric, machine learning, and statistical research methods with business or policy forecasting needs. It provides a no-code interface, so that analysts without a PhD can build, compare, and deploy forecast models. Behind the scenes, Indicio integrates a large number of data sources (for example, Macrobond, Bloomberg, Refinitiv, FRED, Eurostat and many more) for input of indicators. A variable-selection or search algorithm helps identify which external indicators are relevant. It has a rich library of models: statistical, ML, Bayesian, penalized regressions, mixed frequency- and time series models, etc. It also supports model ensembles; weighting of models together, scenario analysis, leading-indicator detection, and backtesting. It automates much of the modeling work, freeing analysts to focus on interpretation, deployment, and monitoring.

Pros

1. Very strong automation and ease of use: no-code tooling means fast iteration, accessible to non-PhD analysts.
2. Broad library of statistical, ML, Bayesian, mixed-frequency, and penalized models + ability to weight/ensemble them, plus integrated variable selection methodology/leading indicator analysis.
3. Integrated access to many external macro / economic data sources (Macrobond, Bloomberg, Refinitiv, FRED, Eurostat etc.), which helps in building richer feature sets.

Cons

1. More expensive than open-source tools: licensing / subscription costs may be high depending on scale.
2. Limited ability to code your own models: you are constrained to the library of models provided; custom or novel model specs may not be possible.
3. Requires internet connection: since data sources, computation, interface are web-based, offline or low-connectivity environments are harder to support.

‍

2. EViews

Introduction
EViews is a long-standing commercial econometric software package, very popular in economic research, central banks, consulting, and academia. It offers a rich set of tools for time-series analysis, panel data, cross-section, forecasting, structural econometric modeling, simulation, hypothesis testing, etc. The user interface is more graphical and menu driven, but also supports scripting and batch runs. In its recent versions (EViews 14 etc.) it has added enhanced capabilities: seasonal adjustment tools, quantile ARDL estimation, MIDAS/GARCH enhancements, tests for structural breaks, etc. It is strong when you need both traditional econometric modelling (VAR, ARIMA, state-space, panel) and good data management, diagnostic tools, and forecasting evaluation tools.

Pros

1. Mature, stable tool with many econometric methods implemented (time series, ARIMA, VAR, GARCH, structural models, state-space etc.).
2. Strong diagnostic, testing, and evaluation tools (e.g. structural break tests, forecast evaluation, forecast averaging).
3. Good for users who both want GUI / menu based ease and scripting / automation; also good support, documentation, publication-quality outputs.

Cons

1. Commercial: license fees can be significant, especially for smaller organizations or independent analysts.
2. Less flexible / less “bleeding edge” in terms of integrating novel ML / deep learning techniques compared to some newer tools.
3. Mostly Windows-oriented; may be less friendly for deployment or integration in cloud / production pipelines compared to open source Python/R tools.

3. R + Forecast / Tidyverse / Bayesian Packages

Introduction
R remains one of the most powerful environments for econometric forecasting. With packages like forecast, fable, tsibble, prophet, bsts, vars, coda, and an increasing number of Bayesian and penalized regression packages, R gives analysts flexibility, transparency, and full control over model specification. Analysts can combine time series, causal regression, state-space models, hierarchical models, etc. Model evaluation, residual diagnostics, cross-validation, and forecasting uncertainty are well supported. Because it is open source, one can continuously integrate new research methods.

Pros

1. Very flexible and extensible: you can code almost anything, adapt models, test newest research ideas.
2. Rich community support, educational resources, many existing packages; transparency of methods means easier to understand behavior.
3. Cost: free; with the ability to run locally (no dependency on internet or external paid services, aside from data sources).

Cons

1. Steep learning curve: requires programming, statistical knowledge; managing dependencies, versioning, reproducibility can take effort.
2. Performance may degrade with very large datasets or very complex models (unless one optimizes / uses fast packages / C++ backends).
3. Deployment / scheduling / monitoring must be set up by yourself; fewer “out of the box” enterprise features than some commercial tools.

4. Python / Statsmodels / Prophet / Other Python Ecosystem Tools

Introduction
Python has become a standard tool for data analytics and forecasting. The Statsmodels library supports SARIMAX, VAR, State Space models, Unobserved Components, etc. Prophet (by Meta) adds an automated forecasting procedure suitable for time series with seasonality and trend and is reasonably robust to missing data and outliers. There are also newer libraries like Darts, scikit-forecasting (statsforecast), pytorch / tensorflow / sklearn pipelines for ML or deep learning forecasting. Python's strong ecosystem (data ingestion, ML pipelines, visualization, deployment) makes it especially useful where forecasts must be integrated into production systems.

Pros

1. Flexibility: you can mix econometric and ML methods, integrate with data pipelines, cloud, etc.
2. Strong open-source support, many libraries; large community.
3. Good for deployment: model serving, REST APIs, containerization etc easier with Python.

Cons

1. As in R, need programming skill; setting up reproducible, well-tested forecast systems takes effort.
2. Some econometric methods (especially advanced ones) may be less polished compared to dedicated econometrics software.
3. For non-seasonal / non-standard data, Prophet’s assumptions may misfit; manual tuning or more complex models may be required.

5. RATS (Regression Analysis of Time Series)

Introduction
RATS is a well-known econometrics/time-series software by Estima. It has strong heritage in academic and applied econometric work. It supports ARIMA, VAR, transfer function / dynamic regression models, spectral analysis, state-space models, GARCH/ARCH, etc. It is command-based, but also has graphical capabilities, data import/export features, strong diagnostics. It is used by practitioners who need solid time-series forecasting with somewhat more control and power than basic tools.

Pros

1. Wide array of econometric models, especially time-series oriented, with established methods.
2. Good for precise, custom model building and detailed diagnostics.
3. Proven track record; reliable, stable.

Cons

1. Proprietary / licensed; cost can be a barrier.
2. Less “glamorous” or comfortable for those used to GUI or modern dashboards; steeper learning curve.
3. Integration / deployment setup might be more manual compared to cloud / SaaS forecasting platforms.

6. SHAZAM

Introduction
SHAZAM is another older but still used econometric/statistics package, especially in academia and in specialized fields. It supports estimation, testing, simulation, forecasting of many kinds of econometric models. Over decades it has developed features for cross-section, time series, systems estimation, and the like. Though it may be less “flashy” than newer tools, its stability, well-documented functionality, and long history make it an option for those needing transparent, thoroughly tested econometric forecasting.

Pros

1. Strong in core econometrics: simulations, hypothesis testing, different estimation methods, etc.
2. Good documentation and long history: mature, well tested.
3. May be less resource-intensive / simpler installation than very large, feature-rich systems.

Cons

1. Interface / user experience may feel somewhat dated.
2. Limited modern features (e.g. less native ML, less automatic variable selection) compared to newer packages.
3. Less community momentum / fewer recent innovations compared to R or Python ecosystems.

7. Gretl

Introduction
Gretl (“Gnu Regression, Econometrics and Time-series Library”) is an open source econometrics package, popular among students, academic researchers, and analysts. It supports a wide variety of time series, cross-section, panel data methods, user scripting, graphics, etc. Because it is free and relatively lightweight, it’s a good option for prototyping models, teaching, small research projects, or early stage forecasting tasks.

Pros

1. Free, open source. Good coverage of core econometric methods.
2. Lightweight; easy to install and run; useful for teaching or for analysts who want to try models without heavy infrastructure.
3. Transparent; good for learning and validating methods.

Cons

1. Less suited for very large datasets or production deployment; fewer modern ML / Bayesian tools built in.
2. Less automated workflows (variable selection, ensemble, etc.) than SaaS tools.
3. Less polish / fewer integrations with external data sources or dashboards.

8. SAS / STATA / Others (Combined)

Introduction
Software like Stata and SAS are also staples in econometrics, statistics, and forecasting. These are commercial tools highly trusted in academic, policy, and corporate work. They provide extensive model libraries (linear, non-linear, panel, time series), diagnostics, as well as scripting, automation, and often good support / user community. Many organizations use them when they have to produce robust forecasts, do scenario analysis, or need regulatory compliance / reproducibility.

Pros

1. Strong commercial support, stability, documentation. Good for regulated or official reporting.
2. Rich toolboxes; many methods implemented; strong diagnostics.
3. Well integrated with data sources, reporting, sometimes GUI + scripting.

Cons

1. Cost: licensing, support, training can be expensive.
2. Sometimes less nimble / slower to adapt newer ML, Bayesian, deep learning or ensemble things unless add-ons or external integrations are used.
3. Could have steeper learning curve; also possibly less friendly for deployment for “self-service” analysts compared to newer SaaS platforms.

How to choose among them & continuous improvement

Here are criteria worth using when evaluating forecasting tools:

• Model variety & flexibility: Can you use many kinds of models (time series, causal regression, Bayesian, ML)? Can you specify or code custom models?
• Data integration: Ability to pull in external macro/economic data, leading indicators, real-time or near real-time sources.
• Automation & ease of use: For users not expert in econometric theory, how much of setup (variable selection, checking stationarity, break detection) is automated?
• Ensembling / model weighting: Forecasts often perform better when combining models; software that supports model averaging or ensembling helps.
• Diagnostics & evaluation: Backtesting, hold-out sample, statistical tests (Diebold-Mariano etc.), cross-validation, break detection, etc.
• Deployment & production: Can forecasts be exported, served, scheduled, monitored for drift?
• Cost, licensing, and support: Open source vs commercial; community vs vendor support; documentation & training.

Also, best practices include continuously evaluating forecast accuracy over time, retraining or replacing models as data or regimes shift, adding new indicators, and possibly combining forecasts from multiple tools or model types.

‍